Press Release: Judges Petition Supreme Court to Revoke Provisions for Out-of-State Legal Representation

PRESS RELEASE

Water Protector Legal Collective
P.O. Box 578
Mandan, ND 58554
701-595-1509

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

JUDGES PETITION SUPREME COURT TO REVOKE PROVISIONS FOR
OUT-OF-STATE LEGAL REPRESENTATION, PUBLIC COMMENTS DUE BY OCT. 2

MANDAN, NORTH DAKOTA. Judges in the South Central Judicial District of North Dakota have petitioned the Supreme Court of North Dakota to revoke provision of services by attorneys from out-of-state to represent Water Protectors with criminal charges from protest activities against the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL).

Filed on September 11th, the petition targets the legal mechanism called “pro hac vice” representation by which many Water Protectors have obtained counsel from out-of-state qualified criminal lawyers who would otherwise not be allowed to represent them.

Claiming that “there is no indication that local attorneys are unavailable to provide representation,” the petition cites erroneous statistics which inaccurately minimize the number of Water Protectors who would be impacted by granting the petition.

With over 150 open cases without representation, the need for out-of-state attorneys remains significant. Moreover, the Supreme Court’s current stipulation that pro hac vice attorneys represent criminal defendants pro bono (without being paid) has already saved the State of North Dakota money that would otherwise be needed to provide defendants with court-appointed representation.

The Water Protector Legal Collective (WPLC) encourages anyone who feels that pro hac vice representation is still needed, or that out-of-state representation has helped them, to send their comments directly to the Court. Written comments will be received for consideration by the Supreme Court until October 2nd at 4pm CST, by emailing the court clerk, Penny Miller, at [email protected] or addressed to 600 E. Boulevard Ave., Bismarck, ND 58505-0530.

3 thoughts on “Press Release: Judges Petition Supreme Court to Revoke Provisions for Out-of-State Legal Representation

  1. Dan McKenzie says:

    Revoking the ability of qualified representation in these cases is criminal. Shame on ND for moving to obstruct justice – what are you afraid of – that your incompetence will be unmasked?

  2. Sara Hayes says:

    Unconscionable but I’m not surprised the unfounded claims, or should I just say lies are coming from the Judges in the South Central Judicial District of North Dakota. We haven’t forgotten about the Water Protectors who still face charges. They should be allowed to use the representation they have. We’re watching,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *